Search for: "State v. J. P." Results 861 - 880 of 4,861
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm by Rosalind English
The determination of the secretary of state’s true purpose in making the deportation order was pivotal to assessing the lawfulness of the detention (R v Governor of Brixton Prison Ex p Soblen (No2) (1963) 2 QB 243 CA). [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
”The second patent under scrutiny was stated to be “[p]otentially … very important”, as it had been found to be essential for compliance with the 3G standard. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:06 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
Ct. 2392, 2425, 2427 (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring) (citing Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:14 am by WSLL
AND LUCY PATTEN DAVIS FOUNDATION AND AMY DAVIS, Individually v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:04 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Ct. 2128, 2139 (2015) (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment); id. at 2142 (Breyer, J., dissenting); Kleindienst v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
But I just ran across an excellent example that I hadn’t found when doing research on that case, State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
How do states’ negotiation alternatives influence the concessions they receive in multilateral negotiations? [read post]