Search for: "State v. L. H.-H." Results 861 - 880 of 2,533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Hayley Evans
In addition to regulating behavior during armed conflict, Protocols II and V, specifically, require parties to a conflict to take specific measures post-conflict to reduce the dangers posed by mines, booby traps, and other forms of unexploded and abandoned ordnance. [read post]
” One can still read the Missouri statute, plausibly, to make his behavior a crime.In a 2009 case, United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; Roger L. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm by John Buhl
Supreme Court Is Likely to Uphold State Powers in Some Way The pending South Dakota v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
Never Too Late 183 [week ending 18 February] Mr Justice Carr's L'Oreal v RN Ventures decision bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Parts I and II) | Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
PatentsIn a two-part report, the AmeriKat exfoliates the decision in L'Oreal v RN Ventures [2018] EWHC 173, in which Mr Justice Carr bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Part I and Part II)Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]