Search for: "State v. London" Results 861 - 880 of 4,122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2011, 2:21 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
In 2005, the claimant (Stephen Sugar, a London solicitor who is now deceased) made a request for the BBC to disclose the Balen Report under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:17 pm by NL
Nzamy v Brent London Borough Council Court of Appeal, January 26, 2011 [Arden eflash 420. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Croydon London Borough Council v Kalonga (2021) EWCA Civ 77 This is the Court of Appeal judgment of Croydon’s appeal from the High Court decision that we noted here. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 9:24 am by Giles Peaker
Ake v Lewisham Borough Council (2024) K40CL060 (Central London County Court 4 February 2024) (copy of judgment) This was a statutory appeal pursuant to section 204 of the Housing Act 1996 (‘the 1996 Act’), against a review decision made by Lewisham Borough Council on 27 February 2023. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:11 am by Adam Wagner
This confined him to a flat for 16 hours a day in a Midlands town 150 miles away from his family in London. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
  The Court of Appeal held that Argentina was protected by state immunity. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm by Rosalind English
 In Baker v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141, Dyson LJ, at paragraph 31, Sir John Dyson emphasised that the section 71(1) duty was not a duty to achieve the result of eliminating racial discrimination as such, or to promote equal opportunity, but a duty to have “due regard” to the need to achieve these goals. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:17 am
The High Court has given us an answer in the case of London District Properties Management Limited v Goolamy [2009] EWHC 1367 (Admin). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
(G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2004] 2 AC 208 (HL(E))  establishes that it is not possible to carve out a section 17 duty to house families where children are already accommodated. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
(G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2004] 2 AC 208 (HL(E))  establishes that it is not possible to carve out a section 17 duty to house families where children are already accommodated. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:09 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cardinal Vaughan Memorial School, R (on the application of) v The Archbishop of Westminster & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 433 (14 April 2011) H and L v A City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 403 (14 April 2011) Marcroft v Heartland (Midlands) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 438 (14 April 2011) Desai v National Car Parks Services (NCP) [2011] EWCA Civ 402 (14 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Deeney, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 893 (14… [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:21 pm
Mark Zieg, a software engineer who blogs at London Crackers said, It already is legal. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 11:22 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Aziz v Aziz & Ors Rev 1 [2007] EWCA Civ 712 (11 July 2007) Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 688 (11 July 2007) Adelson & Anor v Associated Newspapers Ltd. [2007] EWCA Civ 701 (09 July 2007) MM, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 687 (06 July 2007) Togher v Revenue and Customs Prosecutions… [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 9:28 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has issued its eagerly awaited ruling in Ehrenfeld v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 12:54 pm
An excited and admiring audience of IP enthusiasts convened yesterday afternoon to enjoy a stimulating presentation by the Institute of Brand and Innovation Law (IBIL), University College London. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
An advisory opinion handed down  4 September in the European Court of Justice (ECJ) may have signalled an end to the English court's ability to issue anti-suit injunctions against parties who commence parallel litigation in other EC Member State countries.The opinion, in Allianz SpA (formerly Riunione Adriatica Di Sicurta SpA) and Others v West Tankers Inc,  arises out of the collision of a vessel, owned by West Tankers Inc and chartered to Erg Petroli SpA,… [read post]