Search for: "State v. Martinez" Results 861 - 880 of 1,777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2018, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Even as amplified by the plaintiff’s affidavit and supporting evidence, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83), the complaint failed to allege that the defendants acted “with intent to deceive the court or any party” (Judiciary Law § 487[1]; see Fleyshman v Suckle & Schlesinger, PLLC, 91 AD3d 591, 592-593; Jaroslawicz v Cohen, 12 AD3d 160, 160-161). [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:34 am by James Romoser
City of Philadelphia (Leslie Griffin, Verdict) On Fulton v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:51 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, California appellate courts apply intervening state supreme court rules retroactively when reviewing cases, even if the judgment in the trial court was entered prior to the supreme court ruling (Vazquez v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 11:27 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
Those documents “conclusively establish[] a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law” (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]; see CPLR 3211[a][1]). [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Ramirez: The justice will answer the following: “Whether application of the equitable rule the Supreme Court announced in Martinez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 1:59 pm
Supreme Court announced it would review lethal injection through Baze v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Tso (Criminal Law – Judicial Abuse of Office)Martinez v. [read post]