Search for: "State v. Michael" Results 861 - 880 of 12,511
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2007, 10:49 am
The Indiana Supreme Court has posted two decisions, both dated Aug. 8th: In Michael Robertson v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 10:26 am by S2KM Limited
When David and Dorothy Snyder sold Delta Settlements to Michael Upchurch in 2008, David Snyder stated: "One of the main reasons Dorothy and I selected Michael Upchurch to purchase our company is that we felt he will bring much needed "added value" to you, the [Delta] Producers. ... [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
EMI’s state unfair competition claim remains. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:08 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
   In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
At Monday's oral argument in Yeager v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:43 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Police and ultimately, the Legislature, must do their part or the portion of the law requiring impeachment evidence about officers to be handed over to the defense becomes a dead letter: Prosecutors can't turn over materials they themselves never see.The Lege should remove this excuse for civil-service departments - which are only a few dozen agencies out of 2,600+ statewide, though they include some of the largest - to thumb their noses at prosecutors and their Michael Morton Act and… [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 5:27 pm by Howard Bashman
“Faith Can’t Abrogate a Contract; A California state court goes too far in a ruling against Scientology’s arbitration agreement”: Law professor Michael J. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 1:57 pm
State Citation: 2008 WY 118 Docket Number: S-08-0010 Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, the Honorable Michael N. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm by becassidy
District Court Judge Michael Watson ruled yesterday in the case Mays et. al v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 1:16 pm by Gene Quinn
What Chertoff fails to state, however, is that not only has the Department of Energy come out in support of Qualcomm, but so too has the Department of Justice, as well as many others, including former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Paul Michel. [read post]