Search for: "State v. P. B."
Results 861 - 880
of 6,783
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, "[B]oth charges at issue listed dates, albeit as date ranges. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 8:27 am
Part III-B of Regents begins on p. 17. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 5:11 pm
United States, and again there's hand-wringing by the judge who issues it. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:21 am
Souza v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 9:18 am
In this morning's decision in Herring Networks v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 7:22 pm
Victim states assume responsibility for their own conduct that aggravates harm caused illegally by another state. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Whether a court engages with copyright limitations in the decision appears to make a big difference about who wins the case. 60% invoke some limitation; P wins 2/3 of the time when court doesn’t mention limitations; D wins 2/3 of the time when court does do so. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am
P. 72(b)(3); see Marji v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am
P. 72(b)(3); see Marji v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
The diverging approaches of the majority and the dissenters in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 10:47 am
See State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 8:48 am
v=8BDrhsHosIY. 4. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:05 pm
Establish and reestablish regional, State, and local advisory committees for activities under his or her authority. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 11:55 am
Bad faith pursuant to Article 59(1)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR), presupposes the presence of a dishonest state of mind or intention (Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO (C‑104/18 P)). [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 6:54 am
And for dismissal – too soon is too soon Defendants anxious to get rid of an ADA claim they think has no merit may be tempted to raise substantive defenses in a Rule 12(b) motion. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 1:52 pm
P. 23(b)(3). [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
B. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
In Duran v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:47 pm
State case: P lost a counterclaim b/c no one could find the standard; Indiana SCt discusses in 2017 difficulties in accessing a standard. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]