Search for: "State v. Powell" Results 861 - 880 of 1,473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm by Stephen Griffin
Powell, Hale, Commons, Cohen, and Dewey.All very well, but what impact does this “historicist turn” have on conventional versions of the living Constitution as well as the standard debate between this point of view and originalism? [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
In Parents Involved, which the Court decided with its companion case, McFarland v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private… [read post]
7 May 2008, 5:06 pm
One example of Dorf's Law in the United States may be McCleskey v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
  (The other sex offender case the Court has on its decision docket, but not yet scheduled for argument, is United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Cadwalladr stated that she did not intend to convey that meaning, and therefore dropped her truth defence and relied solely on a public interest defence at trial. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:54 am by Tom Goldstein
Powell (a 7-2 opinion regarding Miranda rights) and Black v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:03 pm by Jack Vrett
  As soon as the Prosecutor issued the indictment, the United States House Committee on International Relations sent a letter to Secretary of State Colin Powell asking the Department of State to closely monitor the Prosecutor’s indictment of Gotovina. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]