Search for: "State v. Sharpe" Results 861 - 880 of 2,553
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm by Mark Graber
  The chapter on state constitutionalism corresponds to The Federalist’s frequent invocation of “analog[ies] to your own state constitution. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am by Brooke
 Also at Public Books is a review of Benjamin Peters' How Not to Network a Nation: The Uneasy History of the Soviet Internet.A Fiery and Furious People: a History of Violence in England by James Sharpe is reviewed in The Times Literary Supplement and the New Statesman.Mary Beard discusses her SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome in the Los Angeles Review of Books.Cornelia Hughes Dayton and Sharon V. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Sharp Also Protect Same-Sex Couples' Right to Marry? [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:13 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
At 80, Justice Ginsburg is sharp, on her game, and regularly in the legal news. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 6:43 pm by John Jascob
Since there is no obligation for companies to include projections based on assumptions about future price trends, the shareholder had no viable claims (Heinze v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 8:49 pm by Florian Mueller
Davila of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted IPCom's December 2021 motion to dismiss an amended complaint by Lenovo and its Motorola Mobility subsidiary that alleged breach of contract, monopolization in violation of U.S. antitrust law (Sherman Act Sec. 2), and sought a declaratory judgment of non-infringement of two IPCom patents. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:42 am by Steven Schwinn - Guest
      A sharply divided Supreme Court ruled today (5-4) in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 1:45 pm by Josh Blackman
What about the sharp decline of cert grants? [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 6:17 am by SHG
” United States v. [read post]