Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 861 - 880
of 3,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2020, 5:14 pm
One of the other Supreme Court clerks with whom she served, Deborah Jones Merritt, reflected in the Arizona State Law Journal that Justice McGregor worked on the influential case Mississippi University for Women v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 1:01 am
Board of Education declared “separate but equal” as “inherently unequal,” segregation continues to produce unequal educational opportunities, particularly for low-income minority students. . . . [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 4:23 pm
Take the case of Remcon Plastics v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 8:15 am
He cites as examples the 1970s sex equality cases like Frontiero v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:11 pm
Fifth offense DWI does not equal Second offense State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Board of Education. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 9:05 am
That is, the Charter states that there can be a situation where the provincial law violates such an equality guaranty, yet is nonetheless appropriate. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 9:05 am
That is, the Charter states that there can be a situation where the provincial law violates such an equality guaranty, yet is nonetheless appropriate. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 10:47 am
A couple of people referred to the last sentence of Article V, that no state shall without its consent be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:36 am
Reinstating a decision of the state’s Workers’ Compensation Board that had awarded benefits to a medical employee who sustained injuries in a hospital shooting, the New York Court of Appeals, in Timperio v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 12:26 pm
New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
17 May 2018, 5:10 am
A chairman of the Richmond School Board between 1953 and 1961 and a member of the Virginia Board of Education—the crucial years following the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 1:35 pm
The case is L.W. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:14 am
The case, Armour, et al., v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:30 am
Texas (state may not prohibit homosexual acts between consenting adults), Mapp v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:25 am
In her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
