Search for: "State v. Sweet"
Results 861 - 880
of 972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
(This is why those few companies and their congressional benefactors are lobbying so hard to keep that sweet, sweet import protection.) [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
The feds claim that it's not a sweet deal. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
United States Cellular Corporation (N.D. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
. ____ Q: What is the name of the wood pavement patentee in City of Elizabeth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4] The federal government had its own DOMA.[5] But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a celebration… [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am
Additional onion types possibly implicated in this recall included jumbo, colossal, medium, summer, and sweet onions. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
That point was made clear by the Supreme Court just two months ago when, in the case of Matal v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:29 am
" It is seemingly defined as Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart said of pornography, "I know it when I see it" in Jacobellis v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Burwell v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 8:18 am
App. 3d 340 (2004)); (2) the payor is attempting to evade a support obligation ( Sweet, 316 Ill. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:02 pm
Due to shipping considerations, only United States addresses, please. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:08 am
As a matter of law, from the plaintiff’s perspective patent infringement claims are a sweet deal (assuming your claims aren’t totally meritless, in which case the sanctions can be quite severe). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:04 pm
Back to Matthew Kluger v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:23 pm
Who said they aren't slick down in the Lone Star State? [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
I’ve recently started working on a book about reformers’ ideologies and strategies in Sheff v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
Scruggs fee dispute, which led to the Balducci earwigging, which led to sweet potato time, which led to jail time). [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 9:09 am
Massad, William V. [read post]
