Search for: "State v. Taylor"
Results 861 - 880
of 3,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2011, 6:58 am
Taylor, 529 U.S. at 410, 120 S.Ct. at 1522 (“[A]n unreasonable application of federal law is different from an incorrect application of federal law. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
Doyle v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:18 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:13 am
The basic issue the Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit was asked to resolve in the Taylor case was whether or not Taylor’s employee contributions to the Retirement System, required by State law, was “disposable income” within the meaning of the federal Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
" Sheryl Crowder Taylor v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 10:10 am
"* Civil Service Law Article 14, typically referred to as the "Taylor Law. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 2:43 pm
In a neat segue from rubber to plastic, the IPKat wonders how many readers have yet encountered Taylor v Taylor Made Plastics, a curious decision of the US District Court in Tampa, Florida, which marries -- if that be the appropriate word -- the doctrines of IP and family law. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 3:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 5:45 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:05 am
Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, the 80-20 National Asian American Educational Foundation, et al, in Support of Petitioner Brief for Mountain States Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner Brief for the Pacific Legal Foundation, Center for Equal Opportunity, the American Civil Rights Institute, the National Association of Scholars, and Project 21 in Support of Petitioner Brief for Scholars of Econmics and Statistics in Support of Petitioner Brief for Southeastern Legal… [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
This case was also discussed in an earlier post: Did Kentucky's Dram Shop Act Survive Taylor v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 2:17 pm
In the coming weeks, the court is poised to issue a major ruling in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:13 am
’“ Taylor v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:09 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 7:28 am
Taylor, 465 F.3d 174 (5th Cir.2006); Darby v. [read post]
