Search for: "State v. Texas City" Results 861 - 880 of 2,830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2019, 11:10 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Just Liberty analyzed data from police departments in cities with 50,000 population or more and sheriffs in counties with more than 100,000 population. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 2:17 pm by FM Librarian
Reports & journal article:Allowing CBP to Conduct Credible Fear Interviews Undermines Safeguards to Protect Refugees (Human Rights First, April 2019) [text]Barred at the Border: Wait “Lists” Leave Asylum Seekers in Peril at Texas Ports of Entry (Human Rights First, April 2019) [text]"Despite Flurry of Actions, Trump Administration Faces Constraints in Achieving Its Immigration Agenda," Migration Information Source, 25 April 2019 [text]"An Empirical Study of… [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 1:40 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In an opinion in Amawi v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Reyes, 272 S.W.3d 588, 592 (Tex. 2008) (noting that, by enacting the TCHRA, the Texas Legislature "intended to correlate state law with federal law in employment discrimination cases") (quoting Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
In September 2018, the City and the Islamic Association entered into a separate agreement allowing for the approval of the cemetery and in December 2018, the City approved the Islamic Association’s application to develop the land as a cemetery.Here is the complaint in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm by Richard Hunt
The City moved to dismiss based on a lack of standing and failure to state a claim, but the Court was not buying either. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
And once the petition was issued, a simple majority of those landholders could vote to create the MMD and seek the required approval from the City Council and Texas Legislature. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 7:00 am by Adam Faderewski
That honesty also extends to attorneys communicating with unrepresented persons online, which was addressed in ethics opinions from the New York City Bar Association, Oregon State Bar, and the Texas State Bar, Borodkin said. [read post]