Search for: "State v. Worthy" Results 861 - 880 of 2,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
In a series of recent posts (most recent here), I’ve been sharply critical of filings by the Solicitor General in the Hargan v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
In a series of recent posts (most recent here), I’ve been sharply critical of filings by the Solicitor General in the Hargan v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
The study was requested by Congress in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2020 Allen v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
The study was requested by Congress in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2020 Allen v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Apparently, the key question is whether the state acted in subjectively good faith at the time it drew the district lines—not whether the state’s desires were objectively worthy of credit—such that the constitutionality of the federal law on which the state was relying could not undermine the state’s honest efforts (unless the federal law was patently unconstitutional, in which case we might question the sincerity of the… [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:29 am
State DMV, which describes a poor car owner's plight as "a situation almost worthy of Kafka"). [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:51 am by Joe Mullin
That's especially true since the Supreme Court will take a close look at IPRs when it hears Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:05 pm by Shawn R. Dominy, Attorney at Law
  The United States Supreme Court upheld the validity of sobriety checkpoints in Michigan v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:56 am by Larry Ribstein
 There have been similar calls for reform of state securities class actions. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:29 am
State DMV, which describes a poor car owner's plight as "a situation almost worthy of Kafka"). [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 4:04 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  While officially an order to depublish is not an expression of the Court’s view, either as to the correctness of the decision or the law stated therein, the Supreme Court obviously saw something askew in the CEQA analysis that it considered inappropriate for publication, yet not worthy of a grant of review. [read post]