Search for: "Stephens v. State Bar" Results 861 - 880 of 1,674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2020, 9:28 am by Amy Howe
At one point, Justice Stephen Breyer appeared to throw up his hands. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
Lee, 15-789, the Court held that California’s procedural default rule barring claims raised for the first time on state collateral review was sufficiently firmly established and regularly followed to legitimately bar review of habeas claims, shockingly resulting in a reversal of the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Dennis Aftergut
“When government speaks,” Justice Stephen Breyer’s majority opinion states, “it is not barred by the Free Speech Clause from determining the content of what it says. [read post]
THE
2 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm by CAPTAIN
A high court majority rejected Johnson's application for a stay of execution and his petition for review in which he raised the Eighth Amendment challenge.Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer, dissented, saying Johnson’s situation was “as compelling a case” as he had encountered raising the constitutional concerns that Stevens himself raised in a 1995 dissent from another denial of certiorari: Lackey v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am by Lyle Denniston
Florida (10-1139), raising the issue of whether a state government interferes with foreign policy by barring state college professors from using any funds to visit Cuba or any other “terrorist state”; and Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela, et al., v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:54 pm by John Elwood
§ 2254(d) by readily attributing error to the state court in violation of Woodford v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm by Erin Miller
Georgia (1972) interpreted the Eighth Amendment to bar wholly discretionary death sentencing. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:25 pm by Steve Vladeck
As we suggested in our preview of Tuesday’s oral argument in Ross v. [read post]