Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 861 - 880
of 16,384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2018, 4:02 am
All attorney representations are not equal, and a strong public policy of limiting the volume of legal malpractice cases is highlighted by Siemsen v Mevorach 2018 NY Slip Op 02821 Decided on April 25, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
New York State’s Human Rights Law does not protect an employee from all retaliation, only from retaliation that results in an injury or harmNapierala v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2016 NY Slip Op 04832, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentLisa Napierala challenged New York State Division of Human Rights’ [SDHR] determination of "no probable cause" with respect to her complaint that Erie Community College [ECC] had retaliated against… [read post]
6 May 2013, 12:09 pm
But the case for implied preemption is strong. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:26 am
At the date of the proceedings being issued in this case, there was a sufficiently strong probability that an injunction would be required to prevent Teva from infringing. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm
alp judgment continues a strong tradition in European Court jurisprudence where freedom of expression prevails in cases of insult or defamation of heads of state, presidents or high ranking politicians (for example, Lingens v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 12:00 pm
’” See Rales v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:05 pm
The state Supreme Court held in Attorney General v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Also informative are emerging state and local efforts to regulate AI, including increased interest from state attorneys general seeking concurrent enforcement authority with any federal regulatory regime for AI and dozens of state-level legislative proposals, focused on the use of AI in various contexts. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
See Mortimer v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
Prima Paint Corp. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 5:17 am
Provisions of the Bill were incorporated against the states with ridiculous casualness in cases like Gitlow and Cantwell v CT. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 8:05 am
In a 8-1 decision, the United States Supreme Court held in Rita v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 6:28 am
However, the state supreme court justices reversed. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:59 am
The Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:15 am
Since its 1943 decision Parker v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:50 am
Further, the state law claims implicate no federal interest yet California courts have a strong interest in enforcing state law labor claims, like those asserted by Plaintiff herein.See Weltman, 2009 U.S. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:50 pm
(quoting United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
After West Virginia v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:42 am
Padilla One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
