Search for: "Supreme People's Court Monitor"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 12:47 am
It doesn't actually have to obey it.Or maybe it does.The 6th Circuit put it this way.As the district court found, whether slight or significant deviations from the protocol occur, the State's ongoing conduct requires the federal courts to monitor every execution on an ad hoc basis, because the State cannot be trusted to fulfill its otherwise lawful duty to execute inmates sentenced to death.Which is really quite an… [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:28 pm
The bill became rather contentious at times, but ultimately passed with an amendment requiring the State Supreme Court to study the issue of non-lawyer services for immigrants. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
’ Generally only idle people, pursuing ‘idle curiosity’ have time to visit court rooms in person. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 7:38 am
Never take a plea deal, IMO, it's not a deal, and they use it to scare the hell out of people so they do take the deals. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:53 am
That issue will be going back to the Supreme Court this year. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Anybody who caught the flu (other vaccines/drugs seemed to fall by the wayside) would receive medical monitoring monthly (the Ohio Supreme Court has never recognized medical monitoring in any context – let alone as a remedy for consumer fraud). [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
”; “How do lawyer’s reason? [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
MacPherson's case as a matter of contract law, as courts had done up until this point, the New York Supreme Court viewed the case as a tort. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:42 am
" "The people have a right to know who is using their courts. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 11:40 pm
The Mississippi Supreme Court has articulated a set of factors (although Defendants didn’t consult multiple factors or balance anything; just said that the subpoena’s burden would be undue). [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:20 pm
Supreme Court decision dealt a blow to this interpretation of the CFAA. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 9:03 pm
It's why committees exist. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 9:26 am
Supreme Court, referring to the high court's 1982 ruling in Enmund vs. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 3:52 am
So SCOTUS saw nothing wrong with the 3rd court's interpretation of 5th Circuit's pronouncements on liberty interests related to sex-offender conditions. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
" Act 689 is Not Narrowly Tailored The Court first considers the Supreme Court's narrow-tailoring analysis in Brown v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:58 am
Or is it also when people like [name withheld], who were never convicted of contacting a child, are subject to lifetime monitoring? [read blog]
6 Nov 2011, 5:58 am
Or is it also when people like [name withheld], who were never convicted of contacting a child, are subject to lifetime monitoring? [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 10:27 am
I was recently invited to a private workshop on children's online safety policy, where I gave a short presentation about the U.S. legal context. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 4:03 am
Supreme court in Smith v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:39 pm
Also do not research any information about this case, the law, or -- again -- the people involved, including the parties, the witnesses, the lawyers, the judge, or the court personnel. [read post]
