Search for: "Taking Offense v. California" Results 861 - 880 of 1,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Chavez, No. 054679, 055401 Convictions for narcotics conspiracy and possession of a silencer-equipped firearm in furtherance of that conspiracy and imposing consecutive sentences for co-defendant's two offenses are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient to support their conviction; and 2) their sentences were unreasonable U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, December 08, 2008 Carrion v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:17 am by Eric Halliday, Rachael Hanna
That reaction followed a pattern over recent years in which mass shootings and other violent attacks—like those in El Paso, Texas; Gilroy, California; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania—have spurred demands for an increased federal focus on domestic terrorism. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
But a Californian court has held he was engaged in protected First Amendment speech when he seized the microphone at a bingo game and began calling offensive versions of the numbers. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am by Dennis Crouch
Since that decision, the First Amendment right to free expression permits citizens to seek registration of racially offensive trademarks. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 9:17 pm
California, profanity and offensive speech is constitutionally protected, outside of narrow categories (such as fighting words or threats) that simply do not arise in the context of a crowd of 15,000 screaming sports fans. [read post]
The University of Washington’s own Professor Eric Schnapper is involved in the Gonzalez v. [read post]