Search for: "The Corporation Counsel et al" Results 861 - 880 of 1,032
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2009, 1:35 am
California - The California Supreme Court upholds the attorney-client privilege for outside counsel’s communications to a corporate client Seyfarth Shaw LLP "On November 30, 2009, in a highly anticipated ruling, the California Supreme Court strongly preserved the sanctity of the attorney-client privilege in Randall et al. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
What is directly at stake in the new case of Black, et al., v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, et al. (08-861). [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 7:20 pm
 One example shows the case of Fagan v Amerisourcebergen Corp. et al. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 11:47 am
 But it was the "Lorenzo Jones" comment that set the tone for the entire argument in Bilski, et al., v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 2:27 pm by Larry Munn
Microsoft Corporation v. 1276916 Ontario Ltd. et al is not a trademark case. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:01 am
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of Federal Public Defender for District Court of Oregon (in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Liberties Union (in support of petitioners) Brief amici curiae of Association of the Bar of the City of New York et al. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am by Joe Mullin
And, he notes, they can cause lots of conflicts with existing corporate clients. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm by Shannon Sims
---Community Development ClinicClass Unique #: 28930 Course #: 397C Instructor: Way Et Al. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 2:34 am
Rather than fight a lawsuit, Farrar et al removed the material. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:50 am
The big one that everyone is talking about is: McDonald, et al. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]