Search for: "Turner v. Turner" Results 861 - 880 of 1,913
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2021, 7:46 am by Eric Goldman
That unique treatment amounts to singling out under Turner I and triggers heightened scrutiny under the First Amendment. * DJ Lincoln Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:23 am
In Patterson v Turner, 88 AD3d 617, the court ruled that material on Facebook, if relevant, was subject to discovery while in Abrams v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:17 am by Hayleigh Bosher
It includes a discussion on FRAND - the area of law that has seen a significant rise in the number of cases after Unwired Planet v Huawei and Conversant v ZTE & Huawei. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
’” To support the majority decision, Justice Kennedy cites three main cases that established precedent regarding jailing and invasive searches: Turner v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:11 pm
Nadeau, 2010 ME 71, ¶ 18, 1 A.3d 445, 454-55 (2010) (holding that voluntariness of consent to search presents an “analogous” issue to voluntariness of a confession and thus, as in Miller, presents a “legal question that we will review de novo”) Turner v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Turner] Why the Supreme Court is not going to snatch back Obergefell at this point [David Lat] Tariff-like barrier: California commercial fishing license fees are stacked against out-of-staters [Ilya Shapiro and David McDonald, Cato] H.L. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:52 am by SHG
Robins, which upheld a state law rule that required large shopping malls to allow leafleters and signature gatherers (a rule that has since been applied by some lower courts to outdoor spaces in private universities); Turner Broadcasting System v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the defendants demonstrated, prima facie, that the acts that they allegedly failed to perform were beyond the scope of the engagement letter, which was prepared by the defendants and signed by the plaintiff (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d at 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [read post]