Search for: "U. S. v. Force"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,711
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 12:35 pm
Requiring even more findings and further analysis from the district court would be to force a trial on the merits at the certification stage.Slip op. at 60-61 (italics in original; underline added) [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:57 am
Rev. 480 (1990), has been cited for the proposition that the brief that Dawn Johnsen wrote in Webster v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 4:44 pm
Citing People v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:55 pm
Katz v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 1:16 pm
Wingo, 407 U. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
Wingo, 407 U. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 2:11 pm
The matter was forced to trial. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:10 am
., earlier] Court certifies Nutella class action [Russell Jackson, earlier here and here] D.C. agency dismisses Banzhaf’s complaint about single-sex dorms at Catholic U. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
U. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
They made a U-turn and circled back to the park. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:26 am
I’ve pretty much just described the circumstances present in Matter of Digeser v Flach, 2015 NY Slip Op 51609(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Nov. 5, 2015], a post-trial decision handed down earlier this month by Albany County Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
This post assesses the Solicitor General’s argument, in New York v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:24 pm
Gross, 576 U. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 8:16 am
Wisdom Import Sales Co., L.L.C. v Labatt Brewing Co., Ltd., 339 F3d 101 [2d Cir 2003] [“bargained-for minority right to participate in corporate management has value in and of itself and a denial of that right, without more, can give rise to irreparable harm”]; Louis Foodservice Corp. v Vouyiouklis, 2002 NY Slip Op 50448 [U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2002] [“It is well-settled that plaintiffs’ alleged harm, an opportunity for defendants to shift the… [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm
After noting the factual basis for the charges against Davis, the judge outlined the standard of review he was to apply in ruling on her motion for a new trial: A district court, `[u]pon the defendant's motion . . . may vacate any judgment and grant a new trial if the interest of justice so requires. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 7:37 pm
[iv] Nichols v. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 1:01 am
Eugene V. [read post]
