Search for: "U. S. v. Marks"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am
” The Board routinely takes judicial notice of dictionary definitions when supplied with a copy of the definition, Univ. of Notre Dame du Lac v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
(citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
(internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 9:34 am
City of Chicago, 394 U. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 10:08 am
” Lanovaz, 2014 WL 1652338, at *6 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:59 am
S., at 485–486; alterations omitted); Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
Rev. 193-353 (2010).Vandenbergh, Michael P. and Mark A. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
Baker v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
The Press Gazette also says that it has seen “unofficial industry estimates for the following NoW splash stories: “Crouch Beds £800 teen hooker” (8/8/10), “Cheating Roo beds hooker” (5/9/10), “Toon star’s cocaine and sex orgy” (7/11/10), “Matt’s a cheating sex addict (24/11/10) and “I bedded Roo’s Man U team mate” (27/4/11). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
Roosevelt’s decision to remove the United States from the gold standard.[7] New Deal historians commonly compare the Court’s disposition of Perry v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 7:22 am
Brown v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
On the one hand, the First Circuit’s decision in Cusumano v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:17 am
The USPTO Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (“TMEP”) Section 907 explains that “[u]se of a mark in commerce must be lawful use to be the basis for federal registration of the mark. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
Greene’s Energy Group, but losing on the statutory question presented in SAS Institute v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 2:35 am
Some answers are found in Schlissel v Subramanian ;2009 NY Slip Op 52188(U) ; Decided on October 26, 2009 ; Supreme Court, Kings County ; Demarest, J. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
He had been charged with having painted on the house of a family of Pakistani descent the words "Dots U Smell" -- a scurrilous, offensive allusion that incorporates a reference to the tika, a mark on the forehead of some Hindus, especially women, indicating caste or status, or worn by both sexes as an ornament. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
Life After Hate, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 11:13 am
S. ___, ___ (2010) (slip op., at 4–5) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
