Search for: "US v. Crawford"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2009, 4:58 am
The Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz ruled that affidavits prepared by a forensic chemist were testimonial under Crawford. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:34 am
 The US Supreme Court decided the latter question to the contrary last summer in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:42 am
Germany case, and the Application of M. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 9:19 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 12:24 pm
Indiana (clarifying the meaning of "testimonial" in the Court's earlier decision in Crawford v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
Since the use of derivatives for speculation generally leads to a different outcome from the use of derivatives to hedge, the duty of directors to consider the use of derivatives should be limited only to the hedging alternative. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
By December 2008, Newsweek reported that the size of the market amounted to US$600 trillion[v], an exponential increase when compared with the size the market had in 1993 and 2006. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 3:52 pm
Rachel Pickering won in State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 1:25 am
1st_Circuit_seal.png First Circuit vacates and remands conviction based on Confrontation Clause violation under Crawford; during the investigating agent's trial testimony, details were elicited about the statements made by the defendant's non-testifying accomplices (who confessed and pled out before trial) which described the defendant's role in the crime, provided no insight into the course of the investigation and was used by the prosecution as… [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 8:59 pm
In a decision dated September 11, 2009, available on Westlaw but lamentably not on the free Web, in a habeas corpus case called Norris v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:44 pm
Defendant's opportunity to cross-examine a DMV employee who was not directly involved in sending out suspension notices and who had no personal knowledge of defendant's driving record was insufficient to protect defendant's Sixth Amendment right of confrontation (see Crawford v Washington, 541 US 36). [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
See San Saba Energy, L.P. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 2:34 am
Sixth Circuit SEAL.gif Another circuit finds a statement against interest under FRE 804(b)(3) is non-testimonial; Cooperating witness's tape recording of co-defendant bragging to other inmates about his and the defendant's role in the charged robbery was non-testimonial because "a reasonable person in the declarant's [co-defendant's] position" would not anticipate his statement being used against the defendant in investigating and prosecuting… [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:10 pm
It's really, really hard to cross-examine a transcript, which is why those robed people in D.C. bothered to decide Crawford v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:14 am
Massachusetts, the US Supreme Court held that they were. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
Part V will be the conclusion. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:23 am
It’s been five years now since the US Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
Gardner, drawing on several US Supreme Court decisions. [read post]
