Search for: "US v. King" Results 861 - 880 of 5,516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2020, 4:24 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday morning the Court heard first from Ben King who worked for Mr Depp as a house manager in 2014 and 2015. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:08 am by Orin Kerr
King (2011)) that the police can take any steps so long [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:33 am by Rick St. Hilaire
US Attorney Richard Callahan responded on March 16 by initiating a lawsuit against the mummy mask.In a complaint titled United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:14 am by charonqc
I can see Mr Farage shouting obscenities at opposing football fans and flicking V signs, safe in the knowledge that the Police presence will ensure that there is no ‘physical’ retaliation. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
Trade mark dilution has not been found in the U.S. when  a famous mark is used for parody (Louis Vuitton Malletier v Haute Diggity Dog, LLC., 464 F. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
The first three accounts were accessed from the King of Prussia mall branch where Tolliver worked. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
” At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses whether the Court could opt to stay King v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Eric
Other cases in the category of irrational enforcement actions against keyword advertisers: - King v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:37 am
On 22 May 2009 Mr Justice Arnold told us that he was referring a number of questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary reference in one of the most exciting and potentially important trade mark law disputes to be heard in England and Wales in recent times -- the titan struggle between luxury cosmetic kings L’Oréal SA and online auction host eBay (see IPKat post here for background). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
KATNOTE: IF YOU ARE QUITE FAMILIAR WITH THE FACTS THAT TRIGGERED THIS PIECE OF LITIGATION, THE QUESTIONS REFERRED FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING BY THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE ADVOCATE GENERAL'S OPINION, YOU CAN SKIP THIS POST AND MOVE STRAIGHT ON TO L’Oréal  v eBay II: what the Court says   It was only two short years ago that Mr Justice Arnold told us that he was referring a number of questions to the Court of Justice of… [read post]