Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 861 - 880
of 9,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2023, 10:19 am
Although Merpel wonders why the offers were not also made under Part 36, the Judge nevertheless decided that the refusal of the offers by ONI was not "highly unreasonable" (as is the test under see White Book CPR 44.3.12, F & C Alternative Investments (Holdings) v Barthelemy [2012] EWCA Civ 843 at [70] (citing Kiam v MGM), Astex Therapeutics v AstraZeneca [2018] EWCA Civ 2444 at [61]-[78]). [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Code § 16.004 is used unless the Plan establishes a different period. b. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:39 am
Fletcher, and Grant S. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:33 am
Hartigan v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:31 am
IndiaState v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:35 pm
The idea of the illegality doctrine comes from Everet v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
Caremark started out as a logical consequence of Smith v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 3:33 am
So why not us? [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Article V not only imposes supermajority requirements but imposes them at two levels – Congress and state legislatures (or conventions) – both of which must be satisfied. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:29 pm
See King v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
(2) Behar v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
” Slip op. at 62 (quoting from Gerber v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:34 pm
The decision in Edgewood High School of the Sacred Heart, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:05 pm
As the court in Mallet and Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
The Court of Appeals reviewed issue (1) in light of Rule 701, using the r [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
(Halkbank) v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 11:09 am
The HEI would reward contracts for obtaining high measure-level scores for the subset of enrollees with specified SRFs. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:16 am
” United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
(See, e.g., Bowen v. [read post]
