Search for: "US v. McDonald" Results 861 - 880 of 1,664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2017, 7:30 am by Philip Zelikow
  The judge, Gabrielle McDonald, granted our request and in 1982 shut down the training activities in Vietnamese Fishermen’s Ass’n v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:02 pm by Amy Howe
Robin McDonald reports that “[e]ight veteran prosecutors” have filed an amicus brief in support of the death-row inmate in Foster v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:10 pm by John Floyd
Heller which held that “the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding;” and McDonald v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:51 am by Adam Chandler
Kristin Goss has an op-ed in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution on the Second Amendment case pending before the Court, McDonald v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
McDonald's Issue: Whether, under the Lanham Act, Burger King met prudential standing requirements to bring a false advertising claim against McDonald's for fraud involved in various promotional games. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm by Vanessa O'Connell
But the Heller ruling did spawn a bunch of litigation, including, of course, McDonald v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:49 am by Lawrence Solum
The incorporation story features analysis of John Paul Stevens’ final passionate dissent after 35 years on the Court, which came in last Term’s blockbuster Second Amendment incorporation case, McDonald v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 10:02 am by Jon
The most recent such finding was McDonald v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:20 am by Ilya Somin
Thomas' opinion reprises many of the arguments he made for this theory in his insightful concurring opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 17 November 2015, in the case of Trkulja v Google ([2015] VSC 635) McDonald J dismissed an application by Google to set aside the service out of the jurisdiction, concluding that The submissions advanced on behalf of Google fall well short of establishing that Mr Trkulja has no real prospect of establishing at trial that Google is a publisher and/or that any of the material about which he complains is defamatory. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Nonetheless, the main limitation of the case is that the government "conceded that after [McDonald v. [read post]