Search for: "US v. Powell" Results 861 - 880 of 1,349
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 5:45 am by Gideon
It isn’t enough for us to throw our hands up and shrug. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am by NL
The second is the use of 'very highly exceptional' as a threshold. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am by NL
The second is the use of 'very highly exceptional' as a threshold. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:54 am by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
25 years ago today, when the United States Supreme Court dealt a blow to fairness in the death penalty with its ruling in McCleskey v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:10 am by Marissa Miller
Dionne argues that the President’s statements were simply a liberal twist on the tactics used by conservatives to criticize Court decisions. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:40 am by Mary L. Dudziak
See Powell, Stare Decisis and Judicial Restraint, 1991 Journal of Supreme Court History 13, 16. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 9:57 am by NL
According to its press release and a report on 24dash, the RLA has suddenly decided that Powell v Houslow presents a dramatic threat to its private sector members (possibly triggered by our report on Khela v Dainter, heading to the Court of Appeal). [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 9:57 am by NL
According to its press release and a report on 24dash, the RLA has suddenly decided that Powell v Houslow presents a dramatic threat to its private sector members (possibly triggered by our report on Khela v Dainter, heading to the Court of Appeal). [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 7:14 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is also supported by Texas case law in the 1987, Texas Supreme Court case, Crawford v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:16 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Ilyse Schuman has us covered there, with her recap of day 2 in the oral arguments. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm by Pace Law School Library
Preventing coal companies from using compliance schedules to loophole around th [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:08 am by Christopher Sagers
  If the Court takes the case, it would likely clarify the “foreseeability” test for clear articulation first formulated by Justice Powell—something of a foe of antitrust enforcement—in Town of Hallie v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:18 am by Steve Hall
And: Arbitrariness in the imposition of the death penalty is exactly the type of thing the Constitution prohibits, as Justice Lewis Powell, Justice Potter Stewart, and I explained in our joint opinion in Gregg v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 4:49 am
The matter came before Foster J again on 7 February 2012: SL6 Limited v Fat Duck Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 71 (7 February 2012). [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Ryan M. Rodenberg
Carlisle, P.A.Serona Elton: Assistant Professor of Music Business & Entertainment Industries, University of MiamiDennis Curran: Senior Vice President & General Counsel, National Football LeagueStephen Starks: Legal Affairs Director, United States Anti-Doping AgencyScott Shapiro: Praver Shapiro Sports Management, FounderMike Santos: Assistant General Manager, Florida PanthersTony Agnone: Owner, Eastern Athletic ServicesJan Paulsson: Professor, University of Miami School of LawYaphett… [read post]