Search for: "US v. Washington" Results 861 - 880 of 13,735
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2012, 6:24 pm
According to the Securities and Exchange Commission Enforcement Division’s Chief Counsel Joseph Brennan, the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Janus Capital Group Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:15 am by Richard J. Pierce Jr.
Alverson Professor of Law at George Washington University Law School. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 3:32 am by BlogĀ  Editorial
Some progress has been made in the past few years; same-day audio from court arguments has been released in a few cases, beginning with Bush v Gore in 2000. [read post]
13 May 2014, 2:26 am by Walter Olson
Tweet Tags: hot coffee, Stella LiebeckLiebeck v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 9:10 am by Law Lady
Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens is urging Congress to pay reparations for their time in confinement.Speaking in Washington on May 4, Stevens also criticized the Supreme Court for its 2009 decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 1:34 pm
However, the records inspection and maintenance and the calibration of the instrument were not testimonial hearsay as such his confrontation rights were not violated under the principle established Crawford v Washington, 541 US 36 (2004). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 7:36 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Thanks to How Appealing and Sentencing Law and Policy for highlighting State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Rick Scott unlawfully used a super PAC to support his 2018 Senate run. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am by Brian Shiffrin
Not only should the holding in Meekins be questioned, but also those of the courts in US v Feliz (467 F3d 227 [2d Cir. 2006]) and People v Freycinet (11 NY3d 38 [2008]) limiting the application of Crawford with respect to autopsy reports. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
  After the opinions were read they had each of us stand in turn after our names were read as part of the motion for admission made by Tom Bentz, a PAD attorney in Washington. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:30 pm by Venkat
You could conceivably comply with the TCPA by not using an auto-dialer, but violate the Washington statute by sending a commercial text. [read post]