Search for: "United States Army Corps of Engineers"
Results 861 - 880
of 912
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2008, 9:43 pm
Is a determination by the Corps of Engineers that property contains "waters of the United States" and is therefore subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act a "final agency action" subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedures Act? [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
” Meanwhile, under Section 404 of the Act, the Army Corps of Engineers retains authority to regulate the “discharge of dredged or fill material” into waterways or wetlands. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:09 pm
(View Article at ArmyTimes.com) Testimony by former KBR employees substantiated the gross conduct of that company in performing its responsibilities under contracts with the Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:42 am
The United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) solicited public comment, and ultimately concluded that the planned development could go forward. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:30 pm
Army Corps of Engineers may not issue a permit for discharge of fill material otherwise subject to effluent limitations under Sections 301 or 306 of the Clean Water Act. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:47 am
Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:21 pm
Uram and Chase Ensign On May 15, 2008, the Army Corps of Engineers issued a public notice describing and seeking public comment on five templates that seek to standardize the process of obtaining approvals of proposals for mitigation banks. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 5:32 am
United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979) (a case argued and won by my Damon Key colleagues Charlie Bocken and Diane Hastert, preventing the Corps from expanding the servitude to require uncompensated public use of navigable waters covered by federal regulations). [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:48 am
According to the King5 report, The Army Corps of Engineers has been collecting tons of debris in the Sound in the last few days. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:25 am
BogueOn March 31, 2008, the EPA and the Corps issued a new final rule on compensatory mitigation for impacts to waters of the United States under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
Army Corps of Engineers may not issue a permit for discharge of fill material otherwise subject to effluent limitations under Sections 301 or 306 of the Clean Water Act. [read post]
5 May 2008, 9:24 am
A federal judge wrote on Friday that the Army Corps of Engineers can be sued for Hurricane Katrina flood damage caused by a navigation channel called "a hurricane highway. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 6:07 pm
Army] Signal Corps about it, which they did. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 10:08 am
Plaintiffs further allege that the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) violated the ESA and APA when it issued a biological assessment of the transmission line on July 19, 2006 that purportedly failed to ensure against jeopardy to the Golden-cheeked warbler. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:52 pm
On April 10, 2008, the Army Corps of Engineers ("Corps") and the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") issued a final rule governing mitigation requirements for unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other waters of the United States under the section 404 program of the Clean Water Act. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:58 am
Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Action 04-02091 (HHK), 2008 U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 8:41 am
Army Corps of Engineers may become involved through its responsibilities and permitting authority under section 404 of the Clean Water Act and through future development of harbor projects. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:18 pm
Read MoreEPA and Corps Jointly Issue Rapanos GuidanceOn June 5, 2007, the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers jointly issued guidance consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Rapanos. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 7:41 am
Army Corps of Engineers article, "Louisiana state bird recovering with help from Corps," available online. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 1:04 pm
That ruling leaves New Orleanians with only one avenue for recovery of their losses: the United States Army Corps of Engineers, and frankly, that claim isn't looking too good, either.So, if there's going to be any relief for these folks, it will be good old tax dollars. [read post]
