Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 861 - 880 of 8,837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
NAC was found liable on a breach of contract claim in an underlying action against it in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 10:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” And it was “directed at or readily accessible to United States consumers,” republished on online websites. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 8:04 am by Charles Kotuby
As a bit of background, ZF Automotive arrived on the Court’s docket as a consolidation of two cases: ZF Automotive US, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
One future General Counsel and Chairman of the Commission wrote then that the SEC “should impose affirmative environmental disclosure requirements upon all corporate entities subject to its jurisdiction”; “[t]hat the Commission’s authority is not so limited as to preclude such an approach,” he thought, “is apparent from a reading of its statutory authority. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:45 am by John Ellis
On June 15, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
The rate of pay required for non-exempt employees is the regular rate during the pay period the leave is taken if the employer uses the workweek method, or alternatively the employer can use a 90-day lookback for determining the average regular rate, that is generally the same as with the normal state paid sick leave law (unless the employer has any flat-sum bonuses involved, in which case the employer will need to use the Alvarado-method of calculating the regular rate, as detailed here). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:03 am by Jonathan H. Adler
But bound up in that inquiry are a great many issues beyond the question of appellate intervention on which we granted certiorari, among them  standing; mootness; vacatur under United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
But, the panel observe, non-state plaintiffs were not entitled to the same solicitude. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Canadian Solar Inc., 2019 ONCA 992, 444 D.L.R. (4th) 131, at para. 18. [read post]