Search for: "United States v. Adam" Results 861 - 880 of 2,881
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2017, 5:01 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
In this case, the Plaintiff (Sacklow) petitioned the court to change their only child’s name from Veronica Betts to Trevor Adam Betts. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:01 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
In this case, the Plaintiff (Sacklow) petitioned the court to change their only child’s name from Veronica Betts to Trevor Adam Betts. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:03 am by Amy Howe
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Angela Morrison looks at the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:08 am
The “next” US Supreme Court term has already started; although the Court traditionally begins its term on the first Monday in October, this month had oral arguments in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm by The Charge
This was - and is - the promise of the Confrontation Clause.For the last several years, the Supreme Court of the United States has reflected upon the meaning of confrontation without much resolution. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:42 am by Emma Broches, Julia Solomon-Strauss
Four subjects were involved with planned attacks in the United States inspired by or in support of the Islamic State. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:59 am
The Third Circuit did not break new ground here, relying on past precedent:In United States v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:15 pm by Josh Richman
  The amended complaint alleges that DarkMatter Group, an arm of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) security services, recruited defendants Baier, Adams, and Gericke, former members of the U.S. national security establishment, to target perceived dissidents as part of the UAE’s broader cooperation with Saudi Arabia. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:35 am by Adam Chandler
United States, in which the Court held that fleeing from a police officer in a car is a “violent felony” for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 3:41 pm
A more likely interpertation is, that materials purchased for mass production of such videos crossed state lines, is what Congress had in mind, not the construction used to charge Blum in this case.For reasons that are a mystery to this writer, it seens this was not brought up on appeal, and the appeals court went off on a tangent of possession of child porn, see appellate court decision: USA -v- Gregory Blum . [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:08 pm by Francis Pileggi
The Delaware Supreme Court has announced a revised standard for an important aspect of corporate litigation: the analysis of pre-suit demand futility for purposes of pursuing a derivative stockholder claim, in United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:41 am by Alex R. McQuade
Cody Poplin shared the recent Brookings event featuring Senator Chris Murphy discussing the United States and Saudi Arabia’s partnership. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:28 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
How about a copyright infringement war against an educational toy company whose viral video encourages girls to become engineers that is taking shape in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California? [read post]