Search for: "United States v. Andrews"
Results 861 - 880
of 2,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm
Bernstein.Furman Kornfeld & Brennan, LLP, New York, NY (Shari Sckolnick and Andrew R. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:48 am
This is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:48 am
This is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
For example, Chief Justice Warren’s deferential approach to Congress in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
This post is by my colleagues Gail Lees, Andrew Tulumello, Chip Nierlich, Mark Whitburn and Chris Chorba. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:19 am
United States, in which Gorsuch “sets forth a property rights-based argument for the protection of cell phone data under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:59 pm
That provision states: “A United States citizen 18 years of age and resident in this State may vote. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:18 pm
Such a maneuver would have reached the Court in the midst of its continuing deliberations on how to decide the case of United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 2:41 pm
Shaddy v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 43. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 10:44 am
The issue in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 5:59 am
Earlier this month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently recognized that “Hispanic” is a race for purposes of two federal anti-discrimination laws. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 8:56 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm
The United States Department of Justice has decided that the company will not face charges. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:09 am
He is a frequent commentator on constitutional issues and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:20 am
For the brief: https://www.eff.org/document/rios-v-united-states-eff-brief Tags: Locational PrivacyContact: AndrewCrockerStaff Attorneyandrew@eff.org [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler… [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:00 am
That was Judge Rosenbaum today for a unanimous 11th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
