Search for: "United States v. Classic" Results 861 - 880 of 1,750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2007, 6:02 am
Here is the abstract: Thanks to Richard Posner's classic 1972 article, A Theory of Negligence Law, the "Hand formula" of United States. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am by Eugene Volokh
"Temporary restraining orders and permanent injunctions—i.e., court orders that actually forbid speech activities—are classic examples of prior restraints. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by John Dehn
  He is Commander-in-chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several States when called into the actual service of the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:26 pm by Francis Pileggi
Santa Fe that merger challenges were the province of  state law and not classic federal securities laws because they focused on fiduciary duty, not securities deceit and fraud, the Delaware state courts rose to prominence, the professors agreed. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:39 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court has already used the compelling interest test to reject claimed exemptions from tax obligations (United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 10:12 am by Susan Brenner
As Wikipedia explains, the “94 United States district courts are the general trial courts of the United States federal court system”, which is why the federal cases I write about in my posts always originated in a U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
Sea Star Line, LLC, 06-606 QP: "Whether the Carmack Amendment applies to the inland leg of a multimodal shipment to a place in the United States from a place in a territory of the United States even if the inland carrier does not issue a separate bill of lading for the inland leg. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:24 am
“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:55 am by admin
The insurance industry in our post-Citizens United World now gives unlimited amounts of money to judges and justices who publicly campaign promise to overturn decisions like McCormick v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:55 am by admin
The insurance industry in our post-Citizens United World now gives unlimited amounts of money to judges and justices who publicly campaign promise to overturn decisions like McCormick v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:07 am by Daniel Solove
United States dissent, 1919 (His most eloquent defense of free speech) *  The Gitlow v. [read post]