Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,760
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2015, 10:55 am
United States for this proposition. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 4:33 pm
It might be assumed that an extension of the copyright term in the TPP wouldn't affect the United States, because our law already provides for that same copyright term. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
The litigants in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
See Brief for Petitioners 27, Reply Brief 16; Brief for Respondents 43; see also Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 12–13.Teva Pharma. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
Is it about combatting residential segregation to achieve a more integrated set of living patterns across the United States? [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
Prior to launch of Lecaent in the United Kingdom the First, Second and Third Defendants and each of them shall ensure that each pack of Lecaent supplied to a pharmacist is accompanied by removable notification that is easily legible stating:'This product is not authorised for the treatment of pain and must not be dispensed for such purposes.'5. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
United States (1879). [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:11 am
The Benchbook is perhaps the best resource on law and practice in the district courts.In 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Turner v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 1:42 pm
United States, Case #: 13-9026, Date Filed: January 13, 2015 Scalia, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 1:42 pm
United States, Case #: 13-9026, Date Filed: January 13, 2015 Scalia, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
But is this theory applicable to the President of the United States? [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:15 am
A Classic David vs. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
United States), for federal agents, and to 1961 (Mapp v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:09 am
” The Kims’ problem is that they don’t have a great deal of evidence to back up their allegations – a classic Catch-22, of course, because, as the court put it, it is “the defendant State itself [that] prevents any evidence from leaving its borders. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
United States, has restored over the past decade a meaningful and responsible role to judges at sentencing. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:08 am
McNeely, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:13 am
The Newman and Chiasson Case In United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
