Search for: "United States v. Frank" Results 861 - 880 of 2,016
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2008, 3:12 pm
Like Jeralyn, mcjoan has a good analysis of the just released Al Haramein v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:49 pm by Eric Muller
For five years, from 1943 to 1948, Gene served as law clerk to Associate Justice Frank Murphy of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 9:17 am by Kara OBrien
National Australia Bank The Supreme Court held 10(b) applies only where the purchase or sale of securities occurred on an American exchange or in the United States. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:14 am by Aurora Barnes
State National Bank of Big Spring v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:30 am by Janet Lindenmuth
The case was eventually appealed to the United States Supreme Court which found in Burton v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” The OCC further notes in the letter that it is “committed to preserving the legal framework for preemption established by Congress, including in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 8:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" The court quoted language from the United States Supreme Court's decision in Prince v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
  Last week, in State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am by Chris Wesner
This document has been electronically entered in the records of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:12 am by Sandy Levinson
  So now let’s turn to the subject of Article V amendments and the validity of continuing state ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment, about which I have expressed doubts—and which is defended by at least two very able participants on this venue, with reference, especially in Rachel Frank’s interesting post, to lawyers like Walter Dellinger whom I esteem in the highest possible degree. [read post]