Search for: "United States v. Gray"
Results 861 - 880
of 924
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
” Ropes and Gray Associate Edward Machin said the ICO’s approach could make it one of Europe’s most aggressive privacy regulators, InfoSecurity Magazine reports. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 7:40 am
In a second-degree murder case, the trial court did not err by omitting a jury instruction on the defense of accident or by sentencing the defendant as a Class B1 felon State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:16 pm
The law is many shades of gray. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:31 pm
Conversely, Barrett authored an opinion coded as “liberal” in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:09 am
Thomas could not offer the United States District Court jury his opinion on the legality of the contributions. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
Book Chapters: Rishi Batra, Integrative v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 1:41 am
Cindy: How did the United States get into this place where we treat financial transactions like they're, you know, not vitally private to people. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Gray markets; etc. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 11:00 am
The clearest example was United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
In 1981, in Rostker v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
The implications of the filing were captured on CNN, where host Kaitlan Collins explained that “the First Amendment does not allow the President of the United States to go and claim there was fraud when he was told there was not fraud…” That is, of course, entirely wrong. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
By 1981, the Supreme Court was reviewing a sex discrimination case titled Rostker v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
" It has been a truism since Marbury v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
Grais and Kathryn C. [read post]
