Search for: "United States v. James" Results 861 - 880 of 4,929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 2:32 pm by Unknown
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (Navajo–Hopi Settlement Act; Administrative Procedure Act) United States of America v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 3:46 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
United States, the climate lawsuit brought by 21 youth plaintiffs. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
The Case and the Decision After his appointment as City Manager for Port Huron, Michigan, James Freed expanded the use of his “public” Facebook page to post about not only personal matters but also about matters related to his public office. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm by NARF
Baker and Mathew (Tribal Jurisdiction; Younger Abstention Doctrine) United States v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
History records that James Madison, the fourth President of the United States of America, stated that "(w)e have staked the whole future of our new nation . . . upon the capacity of each of ourselves to govern ourselves according to the moral principles of the Ten Commandments.The bill now goes to Governor Jeff Landry for his signature. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 11:29 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
However, in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am by William S. Dodge
Although ICJ decisions lack formal precedential effect, I agree with Jamshidi that the ICJ’s decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
After reviewing prior Third Circuit precedent and analyzing relevant United States Supreme Court decisions on vessel status, the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the Third Circuit and concluded that the Grand Palais was not a vessel. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:52 am by admin
First, whether § 51 applies to all state building codes or “only those concerning fire safety” as stated in McAllister v. [read post]