Search for: "United States v. Long"
Results 861 - 880
of 23,323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
This is dispositive proof that the Presidency is also not an "office *** under the United States" for the purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.The post Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:45 pm
Professor Jill Lepore's Jorde lecture paints a rich portrait of state constitutional conventions as engines of democratization during the 1800s and issues a dire warning about the United States' ongoing amendment drought. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:44 pm
Professor Jill Lepore's Jorde lecture paints a rich portrait of state constitutional conventions as engines of democratization during the 1800s and issues a dire warning about the United States' ongoing amendment drought. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
” Indeed, they reject any difference between an “Officer of the United States” and an “Office under the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
In 1938, Congress established a nine-person Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise Committee with representatives from the United States House of Representatives, the United States Senate, and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 am
United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am
" Professor Tillman, heavily bearded with black-rimmed glasses and a bookish demeanor, flew to the United States this week to watch the arguments. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
United States) or whether an issue lacks "judicially discoverable and manageable standards" to apply as law (such as political gerrymandering claims, as in Rucho v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:58 am
Like Brown v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm
Reed then explicitly rejects the Lederman view, in a discussion which concludes: The United States is a constitutional democracy. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 11:29 am
Recall that in 2018, in Pereira v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 8:03 am
She wrote: For more than forty years, our Nation’s military leaders have determined that a diverse Army officer corps is a national-security imperative and that achieving that diversity requires limited consideration of race in selecting those who join the Army as cadets at the United States Military Academy at West Point. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:57 am
The business judgment rule is a critical feature of the law governing corporations throughout the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
The voters dismiss this argument, countering that the president has been called the “chief executive officer of the United States” since long before the 14th Amendment was drafted. [read post]
