Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 861 - 880 of 9,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
The Court therefore concluded that “although it had been established that the contested trade mark had acquired distinctive character through use in Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom, the Board of Appeal could not validly conclude its examination of the distinctive character acquired by the contested trade mark throughout the European Union on the basis of the percentage of the public recognising… [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Inc. of Palo Alto, California, the United States of America, represented by Heller Ehrman LLP, the United States of America. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 11:00 am by Elin Hofverberg
Tomorrow, October 24, is United Nations Day (UN Day), which marks the 75th anniversary of the creation of the United Nations. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:32 am
United States, No. 16-5454, Justice Thomas issued a dissent from the denial of certiorari. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am by The Federalist Society
United States, involving the Treaty Power and the structural limits of federal authority, Schuette v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am by The Federalist Society
United States, involving the Treaty Power and the structural limits of federal authority, Schuette v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:18 am
Applicant Ramkumar is an individual who has filed a number of applications to register telecommunications and Internet-related marks in the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 7:28 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
(“SIP-IP”) of Irvine, California, that Veridus Group has not infringed SIP-IP’s rights in United States Trademark Registration No. 5,294,263 for the mark VERI-SITE. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am by Joshua Matz
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:49 am by Gmlevine
The Panel noted that Complainant “is …. recognized as the owner of a family of R US marks under the United States trademark law. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:00 am by Record on Appeal
  The panel consisted of United States District Court Judge J. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am by Andrew Hamm
United States and United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]