Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 861 - 880
of 10,388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
The Court had held in 1909 that people who were employed by or received pensions from the United States couldn’t serve as jurors in federal criminal cases. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:20 am
Aimee Brown argues for the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
These provisions of Texas' self-defense laws generally track the laws in other U.S. states. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am
” Account Stated Claim An “account stated” is “an agreement between the parties to an account based upon prior transactions between them with respect to the correctness of the separate items composing the account and the balance due, if any, in favor of one party or the other” (Shea & Gould v Burr, 194 AD2d 369, 370 [1st Dept 1993] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
In the recent West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
December 11, 2022, marked the centennial of the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
The rule, as drafted, would prohibit employers throughout the United States from relying on or enforcing covenants to not compete. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
Defendants have asserted a counterclaim for account stated. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Thus, I have for some years now been engaged in a friendly dispute with yet another close friend, Mark Graber, about the nomenclature of 1776 and its aftermath. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
(quotation marks and citation omitted). [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:23 pm
Congratulations to Mark J. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:27 am
No special legislation in the United States was necessary to make it effective. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:22 am
” Blum v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
The evidence showed that Petitioner Cubatabaco enjoyed legal protection of the COHIBA mark in Cuba prior to Respondent General Cigar's constructive first use date in the United States, and that General Cigar had knowledge of Cubatabaco's use of the mark in Cuba prior to filing its underlying applications. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
Mayes’ predecessor, Republican Mark Brnovich, was the lead petitioner in Brnovich v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
[17] Mark A. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
It also marked the last year of that union. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:35 pm
Decisions this Week United StatesDominion v. [read post]
