Search for: "United States v. One Package"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm
Updated | R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, [2010] EWCA Civ 1109 - read judgment The Court of Appeal has held that a local authority was entitled to reduce the care package provided to one of its resident following a re-assessment of her needs, even though this had the effect of forcing her, against her wishes, to use incontinence pads and/or absorbent sheets at night. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 5:47 am
Handsome Brook Farm, LLC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:35 am
” Its patent portfolio mostly relates to tracking vehicles and packages. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 7:31 am
” This case is being prosecuted by Special Assistant United States Attorney Cesar Rivera-Giraud. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
Amelio 293,306 Reuben V. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 11:10 am
(One for each dollar of his special assessment, on the sole reversed count).United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 12:36 pm
The White House also stated that dreamers whose protections are set to expire will be able to renew their status for one year, instead of the previous two-year renewals. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
In June 2019, Vitamin Energy was sued in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by International IP Holdings, LLC, and Innovation Ventures, LLC, the owners of trademarks for 5-hour Energy liquid energy shots. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 6:42 pm
For example, Amazon argued that it did not set the price for third-party products and therefore cannot “spread the cost of defects across units sold. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 11:55 am
The United States Constitution, however, also protects rights of speech and press freedom. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 1:45 pm
The United States Supreme Court explained this over 60 years ago in Lambert v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:57 am
The United States also slapped sanctions on entities based in China, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al., No. 15-1314 4. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:32 am
White v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 1:01 am
On April 13, 1950, a Texas District Court found the United States responsible for a litany of negligent acts of omission and commission by 168 named agencies and their representatives, in the manufacture, packaging, and labeling of ammonium nitrate. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
Rather:A federal court may act as a judicial pioneer when interpreting the United States Constitution and federal law. . . . [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am
GE Healthcare, Ltd., et. al (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: Judge Solis compares false marking to ‘someone who says, ‘I am not married,’ when indeed, they are’: United States of America, ex rel. [read post]
