Search for: "United States v. Sharpe"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,466
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2014, 3:31 pm
That the victims suffered harm outside the United States may not matter under RICO. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 11:35 am
In a sharp escalation of the ongoing debate over military launch contracts, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk announced Friday afternoon that the company was filing suit against the Air Force to formally protest a “block buy” contract the service made with United Launch Alliance. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm
There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this Court’s precedents for the Judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:07 am
In other words, the damage to Katz’s reputation were based on the exceptionally sharp comments of Justice Hart. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:40 am
Sebelius, and United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
The contours of that right are not clear, but they do not protect a former Assistant District Attorney in Brooklyn who lost his job after the DA learned that his father was running for office against a State Senator who was being prosecuted by his office.The case is Sharpe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am
Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:25 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 4:34 am
In the defamation case, Mann v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
In McKinney v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:57 am
United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Others, a Chancery Division, England and Wales, ruling last week from Mr Justice Nugee [don't ask: the Kats haven't come across him either, but he is a Chancery judge], addressed an important preliminary issue. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
United States, by Judith V. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Instead, the court determined that it must apply the two-prong test announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
California and United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am
Indeed, the government argues that Congress should be assumed to have adopted the "rule" the Court announced in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
Rev. 743, 752-53 (2005); see also, e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:17 am
The case of Harris v. [read post]
