Search for: "United States v. Short" Results 861 - 880 of 10,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
[www.markschwab.us][www.markschwab.us]ny-821133 No. 08-13435-P _____________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _____________________________ MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:56 am by Joy Waltemath
An employee’s disability bias claim alleging that her employer discriminated against her based on her short stature survived her employer’s motion to dismiss, a federal district court in Arizona ruled (McElmurry v Arizona Department of Agriculture, June 11, 2013, Snow, G). [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 9:11 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States, No. 13-7120, asking whether a prior conviction of possession of a short-barreled shotgun is a "violent felony" for purposes of the federal Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:42 pm by Michael McKneely
The United States Supreme Court today affirmed an injunction by a three-judge panel requiring California to release prisoners so that within two years the state’s prisons are at no more than 137.5% of their designed occupancy limits. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:48 am
A three-judge panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals unanimously struck down a state voter ID law previously upheld by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 11:18 am by Ray McKoski
United States (here) cites articles from the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the DuPage County Register. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:10 pm by IP Dragon
However, "[b]ecause Defendant PRC's wrongful acts alleged herein arise in connection with a commercial activity that causes a direct effect in the United Stated, Defendant PRC comes within an express exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, viz, 28 U.S.C. section 1605 (a)(2):(a) A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case - (1) in which the foreign… [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am by Bradley Graveline
On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]