Search for: "Vest v. State"
Results 861 - 880
of 3,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Under United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
See, e.g., Halstead v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 1:04 am
For example, holding that the TCPA vests exclusive and total jurisdiction in state courts would "create the anomalous result that state law claims based on unlawful telephone calls could be brought in federal court, while federal TCPA claims based on those same calls could be heard only in state court. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:29 am
They were wearing vests identifying them as police. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:04 pm
In the first place, the 1930 Law does not on its face purport to vest ownership of excavated antiquities in the government. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:03 pm
United States --Notes and Questions --Morrison v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 11:03 am
Ennio Morricone Music Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Haywood v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:53 am
In Battiston v Microsoft Canada Inc (“Microsoft”), an employee was wrongfully dismissed because his employer had failed to bring a harsh termination clause to his attention. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 4:30 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:54 pm
Westrick v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:11 am
" As Alito notes, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 7:23 am
One of the biggest cases to watch is Moore v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
While recent years have seen a loosening of the standing requirements for states (see, e.g., Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:31 am
In Adamson v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
All of the opinions in NFIB v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:36 am
”*** The Court of Appeals has already decided that health insurance for retirees is not a retirement benefit protected against being diminished or impaired by the State's Constitution [Lippman v Sewanhaka Central High School District, 66 NY2d 313].** Regarding a municipality's providing health insurance benefits to its retirees, in McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326, a decision that could significantly affect a municipal retiree's… [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:21 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
