Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of" Results 861 - 880 of 941
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2009, 2:30 pm
As we observed in In re Brana, "[w]ere we to require Phase II testing [human trials] in order to prove utility, the associated costs would prevent many companies from obtaining patent protection on promising new inventions, thereby eliminating an incentive to pursue . . . potential cures. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 6:17 pm
It didn't matter that Obama was technically off the record when he made that remark (meaning that it would not have been printed in a newspaper or posted on an online news site); all that mattered was that the remarks were out there. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:16 am
It didn’t matter that Obama was technically off the record when he made that remark (meaning that it would not have been printed in a newspaper or posted on an online news site); all that mattered was that the remarks were out there. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:34 pm
It's odd that Cravath and Williams & Connolly didn't put more effort into this argument. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Cir. 2008): Limits patentable subject matter. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
A dissent called the majority out for dodging a specifically appealed issue, id. at 1197, and then the Ninth Circuit took the relatively unusual step of granting en banc review. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) GOOD magazine article on Erich Spangenberg: The ethics of patent trolling (The Prior Art)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC to hear claim and continuation rule case en banc; litigation schedule set: Tafas v Doll (Filewrapper) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Gray on Claims) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Inventive Step) CAFC: Properly construed claims failed to read on preferred… [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:39 pm by Steven Hansen
When the Illinois state supreme court refused to take the case, Volkswagen-Germany petitioned the United States Supreme Court, and it granted certiorari to address the issue, which the federal high court noted had “given rise to disagreement among the lower courts. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: EPO sets deadline for presidential applications; Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) (IAM) ECJ: Dutch brewer allowed to use Italian BAVARIA trade marks despite ‘Bayerisches Bier’ (Bavarian Beer) PGI: Bavaria NV and… [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 5:34 am
The area is replete w/ for sale, for lease, for rent signs. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:05 am
Cuomo said in a statement he was planning to sue Lawrence W. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:05 am
Cuomo said in a statement he was planning to sue Lawrence W. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 10:15 am by Kevin Whitaker
I don't agree that your privacy rights only matter when someone uses it to your proven detriment, to me, one's privacy rights are harmed when someone invades it and takes it, regardless of what they do with it. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:14 pm by Walsh & Walsh, P.C.
”  Finding the releases valid as a matter of law, the trial court then granted Pick Up Stix’s motion for summary judgment and denied the motion brought by the plaintiffs. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
(IAM) European Audio-Visual Observatory publishes paper ‘An Introduction to Music Rights for Film and Television Production’ (At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) PGI/PDO applications and amendments: Redykolka cheese from Poland; Spanish meat product Jamón de Teruel; Polish cheese Wielkopolski ser smazony; Hungarian meat product Budapesti téliszalámi (Class 46) (Class 46) What is a ‘covenant not to sue’? [read post]