Search for: "WATSON v. THE STATE" Results 861 - 880 of 1,067
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2009, 3:35 pm
(See prior related posting.)In Watson v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am
A Ninth Circuit panel today has an interesting ruling upholding an unusual condition of supervised release in US v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:20 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 08-0532, 2009 MT 301N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 12:12 pm
Terrence Watson points out that it’s only the penalty that was deemed unconstitutional, not the provision itself, and Big City Lib points out it will have limtied effect on future cases. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:07 am
Watson) which held that the state's existing Good Samaritan law only provided partial protection from lawsuits for negligence when a volunteer provides assistance to a person in peril. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:35 am
(Spicy IP) Coversyl (Perindopril) – Canada: Court of Appeal upholds Trial Division finding of patent validity and infringement: Apotex v ADIR (Pharmacapsules@Gowlings) Cozaar (Losartan) – France: French Patent Office grants paediatric extension of French SPC for Losartan (The SPC Blog) Cozaar/Hyzaar (Losartan) – US: FDA prevails in generic Cozaar/Hyzaar 180-day exclusivity forfeiture litigation: Teva Pharmaceuticals v Sebelius (FDA Law Blog) Diflucan… [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 9:34 am
  Less than a year later, the California Supreme Court struck down the state's death penalty in People v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm by Jason Krebs
Retailer Name Street Address City State 1 Yoss Thriftway Old 71 Highway P.O. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:44 pm
Watson - but have not yet seen. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]