Search for: "Walsh v. Walsh" Results 861 - 880 of 1,717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Kraemer”Keith Mayes, University of Minnesota, “Of Deacons, Panthers, and Liberation Armies: Civil Rights, Black Power and the Second Amendment,”Camille Walsh, Indiana University, “‘Taxpayer Citizenship’ and the Right to Education: 1929-1959” [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:31 am by Lawrence Solum
” The Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:00 pm by Jim Gerl
Technically, the court denied certiorari in the case of School District of Pontiac, Michigan v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 3:41 pm
" The State of Iowa will receive a $269,450 grant from the Department of Justice through the Adam Walsh Act. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
” [Jessica Campisi, Education Dive; Mark Walsh, Education Week, covering AEI debate on holding of 1973 Supreme Court case of San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 3:41 pm
" The State of Iowa will receive a $269,450 grant from the Department of Justice through the Adam Walsh Act. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:45 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen reports on the latest developments in Shapiro v. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 3:35 pm
" Member Walsh concurred in the result but not the rationale. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 6:43 am by James Romoser
Here’s a round-up of other Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Biden’s Top SCOTUS Lawyer Should Be Woman, Court Watchers Say (Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson & Jess Bravin, Bloomberg Law) Supreme Court Rejects Texas Inmates’ Plea for Stronger Health Measures (Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal) Smith Has Got to Go (James Phillips, National Review) Supreme Court Declines Appeal Backed by Illinois School Districts on Tax Remedies (Mark Walsh,… [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 6:09 pm
Sentencing Law and Policy has an interesting post about the Sixth Circuit's denial of en banc rehearing in Doe v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:52 am by SOIssues
The United States Supreme Court in 2003 stated in Smith v Doe that the ex post facto application of these Sex Offender Registration Laws was not Punitive in nature, but civil and regulatory intent. [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:01 pm by CJLF Staff
  Denny Walsh of the Sacramento Bee reports on the high court's decision in People v. [read post]