Search for: "Walters v State" Results 861 - 880 of 1,811
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2024, 7:16 am by Daniel Deacon
Much of that reorientation from deference to delegation was already accomplished in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
(The most comprehensive argument against standing is in the Walter Dellinger brief by Irv Gornstein.) [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 10:41 am by Lyle Denniston
Walter Quijano, had been summoned by Buck’s trial lawyer to testify on the dangerousness issue. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Instead, 1968 marked the first year of an unofficial moratorium on executions in the lead-up to the Supreme Court’s 1972 Furman v Georgia decision. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:11 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 13 and Thursday 14 May 2020, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
The Supreme Court has even stated as much in its 1985 decision in Heckler v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 5:00 am by Matt Danzer
After the ups and downs of this week’s hearings in the military commissions case of United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 ABC (AP) v Principal Reporter & Anor (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019… [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 1:37 am
I would generalize that (I've done so, more or less, relying in part on a reading of Walter Nixon v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 10:32 am by Larry
In Amcor Flexibles Singen GMBG v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:42 am by Quinta Jurecic
And April Doss defended the 9th Circuit’s reading of the government’s ability to use information collected through 702 surveillance in U.S. v. [read post]