Search for: "Washington v. Government of District of Columbia" Results 861 - 880 of 1,071
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2009, 8:41 pm
So far, seven states have altogether banned texting while driving: Alaska, California, Connecticut, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Jersey, and Washington, along with the District of Columbia. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm by Jim Martin
Jeremy Kessler, of Columbia University, provided four examples from the war period where the government promoted civil liberties and rights. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
” The Washington Post and the Independent covered the story. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  Cases under the Constitution generally require the Court to determine or define the power of another part of the government, such as the power of Congress or a State to pass a law. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
” Moreover, the earlier ban was imposed in 1994 — before the Supreme Court ruled in District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
  As fate might have it, the question of market share liability in New Jersey was governed by a case, Shackil v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:21 am by Stephen Wermiel
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, having been nominated less than two years earlier by Bush. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:49 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to limit lawyers handling appeals from military decisions classifying detainees as enemy combatants to three visits per client; to let the government read lawyer-client letters; and to let it deny the lawyers access to secret evidence. [read post]
21 May 2015, 12:22 pm by John Floyd
A classic example of this corrupt practice by some federal law enforcement agents, and the prosecutors who allow it to continue, can be found in the May 15, 2015 decision by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Liberty Under Law, An Interpretation of the Principles of Our Constitutional Government (1922) Robert Houghwout Jackson, Full Faith and Credit, the Lawyer’s Clause of the Constitution (1945) Hugo L. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
The defendants had moved in limine to exclude Oreskes’ proferred historian testimony,[11] under the District of Columbia’s standard for admitting and excluding expert witness opinion testimony.[12] Oreskes’ opinion, at issue in the Mann case, was on the general basis for finding scientific research to be reliable, and that “think-tanks” (including the defendant CEI) “ignore, misrepresent, or reject” principled scientific thought on… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:49 am
  District of Columbia v. [read post]