Search for: "Weeks v. State of Me."
Results 861 - 880
of 7,293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
This post is about a single line of the judgment which made me say ‘hang on a minute…. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
This week we have five new relists. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am
Like the J.B. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:29 am
Let me explain. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 8:24 am
Equity for thee but not for me. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
I'd like to thank Eugene one more time for giving me the opportunity to blog this week at The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 1:42 pm
Here’s what they taught me. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 9:38 am
Patrick: Thank you for having me. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 10:13 am
Then I'm not a teenager in the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
" Thus, in Cohens v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
DorfWith first-semester constitutional law grading behind me, I recently turned my pedagogical energy towards revising my syllabus for the coming semester's instantiation of my federal courts course. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 6:42 am
The fact that the lawsuit falls into this category is noteworthy, at least to me. [read post]
8 Jan 2022, 8:30 am
But Law 360 has generously allowed me to post a PDF version, which is available here for free. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 1:22 pm
As Alison Frankel noted in a January 4, 2022 post on her On the Case blog (here), “last week, two Manhattan state-court judges called off the revolution. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
In Lee v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:30 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:18 am
Facts State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:58 am
Just last week, the Appellate Division, Second Department in Weinstein v Levine applied the direct-derivative dichotomy to an issue that frequently arises in business divorce litigation when the defendants who control the company checkbook use company funds to pay their personal legal fees. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:05 am
That was a clear allusion to FTC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
That was a year marked by two historic advances – the August vote by the Utah Supreme Court approving sweeping changes in legal services regulation in that state, followed two weeks later by the Arizona Supreme Court going even farther, becoming the first state in the nation to completely eliminate the ban on nonlawyers having economic interests in law firms and the prohibition on lawyers sharing legal fees with nonlawyers. [read post]
