Search for: "Wise v. United States" Results 861 - 880 of 1,321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2012, 3:52 pm by Lovechilde
Under the administration plan, illegal immigrants will be able to avoid deportation if they can prove they were brought to the United States before they turned 16 and are younger than 30, have been in the country for at least five continuous years, have no criminal history, graduated from a U.S. high school or earned a GED or served in the military. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:14 am by Eric
Moore had multiple opportunities to settle this case, but he believes that as an artist in the United States, he should have the right to paint subjects that are meaningful to him. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:40 pm by Brett Burlison
Let’s hope he is just as correct and that Citizens United v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm by Matt Cameron
Mass. 2010) is an exciting step forward toward true marriage equality in the United States. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:56 am by Rosalind English
Therefore he could have no “reasonable expectation” of privacy and Article 8 had not been engaged (X v UK (application No 5877/72) [1973], Friedl v Austria (1995) 21 EHRR 83 and Friend v UK [2010] EHRR SE6). [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:56 pm by Eric Turkewitz
For a good read on the long and deep history of such speech in the United States, read the concurring opinion of Justice Clarence Thomas in McIntyre. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm by Steve Honig
  Why is the Civil Liberties Union interested in the healthcare law, bearing in mind it is not overtly a civil liberties statute and the ACLU has taken no position as to whether the healthcare law is wise legislation? [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:42 am by Roy Ginsburg
• Second, the employer may develop a “targeted screen” based on three factors articulated in a 1975 Eighth Circuit decision, Green v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(United States) Company quickly realized it needed to deal with TM online. [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:14 pm by Jay Stanley
Reno decision, the United States Supreme Court agreed, unanimously (and wisely) holding that Internet speech is entitled to the exact same protections as all other speech. [read post]